Data and Trust
People will only tell you the truth if they trust what happens to it
This page sets out what the platform collects, why, who can see it, how long it is kept, and the things it will never do. Share it openly with participants — it is written to be read by them, not only by you.
What we collect
Data, purpose and access
| Data | Why we collect it | Who can see it |
|---|---|---|
| Programme and planning content | Charters, roadmaps, risks, decisions and reports — the working record of the change. | Programme members with an assigned role. |
| Stakeholder group records | To assess impact, plan engagement and track adoption at group level. | Programme members. Groups, not individual profiles. |
| Leadership readiness ratings | To design proportionate support for people leading the change. | Sponsor, change lead and named assessors only. Developmental use only. |
| Pulse and baseline responses | To understand how the change is landing and where to adapt. | Reported only as aggregates above the anonymity threshold. |
| Account and audit records | Security, accountability and version history. | Programme owner and IV administrators. |
Commitments
Firm limits, not aspirations
The platform must not rank or profile individuals
No individual scoring, league tables, sentiment analysis of named people, or automated judgements about performance, attitude or suitability.
Anonymity thresholds are enforced
Pulse and baseline results are only shown when a group has enough responses — five by default, configurable upward, never downward. Free-text is reviewed for identifying detail before it is shared.
Sensitive interview material is handled separately
Verbatim interview and focus-group material is stored against the programme, restricted to named owners, and summarised thematically for wider audiences.
AI output is labelled as draft
Everything the IV Change Guide produces is marked draft and separates evidence, assumption, interpretation, recommendation and the decision a human must make.
Final decisions are made by accountable humans
Gates, go/no-go calls, employment matters and communications release all require a named person to decide and record it.
Serious concerns are routed, not buried
Where a response raises a safeguarding, wellbeing, legal or ethical concern, it is routed to a named owner through your existing organisational channel — not resolved inside the platform.
Participant consent wording you can reuse
Retention and deletion